A little over three weeks ago, Spain’s Athletic Bilbao
played Israel’s Hapoel Kiryat Shmona to a 1-1 tie in a Europa League match at
Bilbao’s San Mamés. The match was a forgettable 90 minutes in Europe’s
conciliatory competition, but a few media outlets did pick up on the
Palestinian solidarity demonstrations put on by some of Bilbao’s supporters.
This wasn’t the first time a sporting event had been the stage for Palestinian
sympathizers to show their support: Celtic fans have held public
demonstrations to raise awareness of incarcerated Palestinians on hunger
strikes, Scotland supporters chanted and sang during an international match against Israel, and
hardliners in Egypt took anti-Israeli sentiment to unfortunate and chilling levels
earlier
this year.
Soccer and politics are no strangers, and issues of race and
class permeate the game at all levels in Europe and throughout. Club soccer
provides an interesting mix of various individual nationalities representing teams
rooted in permanent space and history, and the pride in national teams can
border on xenophobia and jingoism. Matches thus provide arenas for fans to air
political grievances or forms of resistance while under oppression, as seen in
rarely allowed Catalonian pride during Barcelona games while under Franco’s
regime. More violent and unfortunate examples can be found in the ultras of Serbia's Red
Star Belgrade, whose racism and extremism toward Croatians manifested itself on
and off the pitch during the Balkan wars.
What made Bilbao’s protests so striking, then, was that it
was done on the club level of a Spanish team, in full view of Israeli players. As
a loose American equivalent, a mental image of onlookers holding up signs
reading “End Abuse at Gitmo” while Tiger Woods tees off at the British Open
comes to mind. An argument of universal human rights can be made – and I won’t
argue that – but the power of the image remains the same: Soccer fans directly unaffected
by the conditions they are protesting, with the protests themselves aimed at athletes
who have little say in the foreign policy of the country in which they live.
That isn’t to say that I disagree with the show of
solidarity on Bilbao’s part, although it is not something in which I would
participate. I am certainly no Israel apologist when it comes to the treatment
of Palestinians under an occupation lasting well over half a century, but I think there is something to be said for separating the state of Israel from the citizens of Israel. Unless Hapoel Kiryat
Shmona’s left back is an illegal settler, I don’t blame him for the
policies of the country he lives any more than I blame Woods for indefinite
detention.
Soccer and politics will continue to blend, with my work in
Uganda being a constant reminder of that. But there should be a moment of pause
before the sins of the state are shoved in the face of athletes who cannot be
held responsible for them. I salute Bilbao supporters for their consciousness
as human beings, and hope the positive aspects of mixing soccer and politics
continues to promote progressive thought and action. But I also hope that that
consciousness is directed through the proper avenues, and that national policy
doesn’t define individual ideology.
No comments:
Post a Comment